Comments on Puritan Fellowship: Dawkins Admits Atheism Is Absurd-Audio Clip

Equitable,

I did not take Dawkin's quote ou...

2009-01-07T11:31:00.000Z

Equitable,

I did not take Dawkin's quote out of context. The context which was the interview with John MacKay is included in the video clip.

I am merely turning Dawkins logic back on himself.

You accuse me of "bending the truth" and "a person of low moral fibre, and you are a potentially dangerous individual who appears to be prepared to say anything to further their own cause."
but you seem to miss that Dawkins, in the clip from the same TV program, presented Ernst Haeckel's Embryo drawings, which have been known to be fraudulent for well over 100 years, as proof for the fairy tale of evolution.

I can only ask you to spend some time, in looking at the claims of Christ, rather than continuing in trying to run from God. Eternity in Hell is a long time to be wrong about this. Surely it's worth letting go of your pride and looking into Christianity with an open-mind?

Even in your rebellion and shaking your fist at your Creator who gave you life, Jesus Christ, stands there, arms open wide, for you to come to Him and be forgiven and made right with God, and have eternal life.

Please do take the time to follow a few links: How would you feel if your thought life was to be shown on National TV tonight?

And also:
First and Essential Principles of Christianity Series
at least get a clear understanding of what you are rejecting.

Jesus offers you eternal life.

I do not have an atheist agenda in writing this co...

2009-01-06T13:42:00.000Z

I do not have an atheist agenda in writing this comment, but I do know that Richard Dawkins is an articulate and intelligent individual whose position in one of Britains most respected learning institutions is evidence enough of his capabilities in debating complex issues.

Richard Dawkins position on religion is very clear, he states that there is no evidence for a God and therefore does not believe in a God. I have no doubt that you are aware of his position and yet you clearly take a very short sentance from a much longer piece of well argumented analysis (I have seen the full version), you clearly take this sentance out of context and unashamedly use that for your own devices, and even when challenged by other posters on this site you continue to persue this 'bending' of the truth.

I have no dounbt that you are really aware that you are doing this and I can therefore only conclude that you are a person of low moral fibre, and you are a potentially dangerous individual who appears to be prepared to say anything to further their own cause. Unfortuantley, and I'm sure you are well aware of this, some individuals in society are likely to be influenced by your 'bending' of the facts.

This is very disappointing to me, I live in Rochdale, probably no more than about 5 miles from you, and I would have been very interested in hearing your views on God and religion to help me with my own thoughts on this subject. Now I know to stay well away and advise anyone else to do the same.

I hope you can get your own house in order and focus on delivering mature and well constructed debating points, rather than rather childish personal attacks that bend the truth for personal gain.

Hi Shh,

As Dawkins admitted in the program ...

2008-11-10T22:09:00.000Z

Hi Shh,

As Dawkins admitted in the program it's not just a "yourself" that has not seen evidence for evolution. But no-one ever has seen evidence.

You say Haekel's drawings were never "proof", not even evidence,", but evolutionist's have given this fraud as evidence, in fact Dawkins presented this as evidence in this very documentary. The screenshot and commentary by Dawkins is provided in the video clip.

Ken Miller is not a Christian, he's a Roman Catholic.

You can stick your head in the sand, and choose to ignore the complex Creation around you. But you'll still have to face a Holy God on Judgment Day.

A God so Holy He's even going to judge your thought life. Hold you accountable for every wicked thought you've had.

How would you feel if your Thought Life Was On TV

"the refusal to believe in anything you can't see ...

2008-11-10T18:32:00.000Z

"the refusal to believe in anything you can't see yourself is absurd."
The key word here is "yourself".
This statement is true, it'd be absurd for me to not believe in America because I have not seen it.
It is not absurd however, to refuse to believe in something which no-one has ever seen, even less for something which no verifiable evidence can even be conceived. Your quotes looks like quote-mines because you conflate one person not seeing it, with no evidence whatsoever.
Haekel's drawings were never "proof", not even evidence, no drawing can be, they're illustrations and are used as such, thinking it possible that they could be proof simply means (again) you don't understand standards for evidence.
Another reason you'll be accused of quote mining, is that you don't supply the places you've gotten these conversations from.
The "evolution is blind faith" argument is nonsensical, and I doubt it would take Dawkins, or anyone else who could be bothered, would be able to dismantle it in a few sentences.
One actually, "Faith in the most utilized self correcting technique in history is not blind."
I get that Dawkins annoys hardcore Christians, but have a read of some Ken Miller, a Christian biologist, or even read the Kitzmiller vs. Dover transcripts, Creationism is nonsense, and is dependant on the kinds of errors, mis-contextualisations, and omissions, which recur in your blog, to seem in any sense coherent.

John MacKay will be speaking at a church hear in M...

2008-08-28T09:14:00.000+01:00

John MacKay will be speaking at a church hear in Manchester in October. I'll get the details for anyone who's interested.

To all the atheist-evolutionist,
Whateve...

2008-08-26T10:43:00.000+01:00

To all the atheist-evolutionist,
Whateverman, Adam, and any others who read this:

What is the story with you? Why do you hate God so much?
And please don’t tell me you really don’t believe He exists, as your actions betray your words.

No-one in their right mind would display such moronic behaviour as to spend all day on the internet, spamming Christian websites and attacking a God IF they didn’t really believe in Him.

So come on, what is your real story, why do you have such a hatred for your Creator, who you will one day stand before in judgement? Or perhaps that is the reason.
You see, if you really didn’t believe in God, then you wouldn’t bother wasting time attacking Him. But even though you try to suppress the obvious truth of Him, you can’t escape your conscience which is declaring you GUILTY. GUILTY. GUILTY.

Let me ask you: How would you feel if your thought life was to be shown on National TV tonight? What if someone told you that your every thought from the day you were born had been recorded and will be shown tonight on national TV? And not only that, but a website will flash across the screen during the program, directing all of your friends and family to where they can watch all of your thoughts about them. How many people would be angry with you? Everyone? Would you be angry with yourself?

You may ask what has that got to do with evolution? EVERYTHING!

Because that is the reason, you spend so much time attacking a God you claim you don’t believe in. Because you can’t escape the guilt of your conscience. And you know you will one Day stand before Him, and He has the power to cast you into Hell for all eternity.

Do you look at pornography? Do you lust after women you’re not married to? If so then you’re a pervert. What do you think God will with perverts?

This is not a game. One day all your thought life and all your wicked deeds will be judged, by the God who, although now He offers you mercy, On that Day He will show no mercy to the wicked.

Your thought life reveals the real, unrestrained you. You see, most people wrongly believe they're good people and God won't send them to Hell, but God has seen every one of your wicked thoughts and actions. He has seen every time you've broken His commandments, lusting over someone you're not married to, lying and stealing (no matter how little); He has heard every time you've used His Holy Name in vain, using the name of the One who gave you life in place of a curse word. You wouldn't do that with Hitler's name, but you do it with God’s name! The “Lord will not leave him unpunished who takes His name in vain,” (Exodus 20:7) and “every careless word that people speak, they shall give an accounting for it in the day of judgment.” (Matthew 12:36)

Be honest with yourself: when you face God on Judgment Day - keeping in mind that He's seen your every wicked thought and action - will He find you innocent or guilty? If God gives you what you deserve, should He send you to Heaven or Hell? God has written His moral law on your heart so you are “without excuse” (Romans 1:18-32); you know it is wrong to lie, to steal, to lust, and to curse because God gave you a conscience to know right from wrong. Your own conscience demands justice!

Imagine a courtroom scene where a child rapist is coming before the judge for sentencing. But instead of giving him what justice demands, the judge lets him go free because the rapist is a “nice guy” who has given to charity and goes to church every Sunday. You would be outraged, and you should be! Yet most people think the High and Holy God is just like this corrupt judge, and that they can bribe Him with their “good deeds” so that He'll overlook their sin.

Again, what would you think if the judge said to the rapist, “I'm a very loving judge, so I'll just let you go free?” You would not think that the judge was loving at all, but that he was corrupt and not worthy to be a judge! Yet most people expect the Holy God who is “the judge of all the earth” (Genesis 18:25) to be just that corrupt with them, and overlook their sin.

Infinite Love and Goodness demand Infinite Justice. Because God's love and justice are infinite He won't punish only murderers and rapists, but He'll punish ALL sin wherever it's found. That's why “the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God.” (1 Corinthians 6:9) “No thief, no sexually immoral person, no idolater will enter heaven” (1 Corinthians 6:10) and “all liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone.” (Revelation 21:8)

Now the question for you, dear reader, is this: is there any hope for someone like you? Is there any hope for the person who has defied God time and again by rebelling against His will and refusing to love and worship Him? Is there any hope for the criminal who stands guilty in the courtroom of God? Yes there is! There is forgiveness with God!

The Gospel (“good news”) is this: Imagine you are in a human courtroom and the judge finds you guilty, and because he's just, gives you the maximum fine of ten million pounds. But there is no way you can pay the fine, so you're about to spend the rest of your life in jail. Then someone you've never met before steps into the courtroom and says, “I've sold all my worldly goods to pay your fine.” Your fine has been paid, so justice has been served and you're free to go! Well, two thousand years ago God became a man, Jesus Christ, who was born of a virgin, led a sinless life and then suffered and died under the wrath of God on the cross to pay the penalty in full for all your sins. Then He rose again in triumph over all the powers of death and darkness, so that in Him we can have eternal life. “For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.” (John 3:16)

But it's not enough to merely believe “intellectually” in order to be forgiven by God. The Bible says that even the demons believe intellectually! (James 2:19) In order to have real forgiveness, you must repent, as Jesus Himself said: “unless you repent you will also perish.” (Luke 13:3) And repentance means turning fully away from your life of sin and turning fully to God, trusting in Jesus Christ ALONE to save you and not your own deeds; trusting in Him as the One Who willingly stood in your place on the cross, taking God's wrath for you; the wrath YOU deserve.

What are you waiting for; don't gamble with your eternal salvation! “Your life is a vapor,” (James 4:14) and you have no way of knowing which second will be your last. “Seek the Lord while He may be found; call upon Him while He is near. Let the wicked forsake his way and the unrighteous man his thoughts; and let him return to the Lord, and He will have compassion on him, and to our God, for He will abundantly pardon.” (Isaiah 55:6-7) God takes no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but desires for you to turn from your sins and live! (Ezekiel 18:23) You have a personal invitation from the Lord Jesus Christ Himself: “Come to Me, all who are weary and heavy-laden, and I will give you rest. Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls.” (Matthew 11:28-29)

Whateverman,

“That context is not appare...

2008-08-26T10:08:00.000+01:00
Whateverman,

“That context is not apparent in the chopped up clip you provided. Thus, your assertion of having knowledge of what Dawkins actually meant (despite that information not being available in your clip) is proof you took it out of context.

Liar much?”

With that illogic, then it’s no wonder you believe in fairy stories like evolution.

All that is proof of, is that you claim the context is not apparent to you, but then regardless, you still take a giant leap of blind faith and make dogmatic and slanderous assumptions based on things you readily admit you haven’t a clue about.

The quote is in context, and as I said it is directly after Dawkins interview with Mackay, which is what he’s clearly referring to. That is not even debatable.

"16 And he told them a parable, saying, “The land of a rich man produced plentifully, 17 and he thought to himself, ‘What shall I do, for I have nowhere to store my crops?’ 18 And he said, ‘I will do this: I will tear down my barns and build larger ones, and there I will store all my grain and my goods. 19 And I will say to my soul, Soul, you have ample goods laid up for many years; relax, eat, drink, be merry.’ 20 But God said to him, ‘Fool! This night your soul is required of you, and the things you have prepared, whose will they be?’ 21 So is the one who lays up treasure for himself and is not rich toward God." Luke 12

Whateverman wrote: "It does not show, in any way, ...

2008-08-26T00:58:00.000+01:00
Whateverman wrote: "It does not show, in any way, that Dawkins was responding to McKay."

Puritan said: Are you serious?

He's talking about what Mackays just said. There would be no reason for Dawkins to make the comment otherwise.

That context is not apparent in the chopped up clip you provided. Thus, your assertion of having knowledge of what Dawkins actually meant (despite that information not being available in your clip) is proof you took it out of context.

Liar much?

Whateverman wrote: "It does not show, in any wa...

2008-08-26T00:53:00.000+01:00
Whateverman wrote: "It does not show, in any way, that Dawkins was responding to McKay."

Are you serious?

He's talking about what Mackays just said. There would be no reason for Dawkins to make the comment otherwise.

Listen, none of this will help you on Judgement Day "It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of a Living God"

Rom 1:18 "For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. 19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. 21 For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools,"

"Without this being true, the polio vaccine wou...

2008-08-26T00:44:00.000+01:00
"Without this being true, the polio vaccine would not exist today. Evidence of the validity of evolutionary theory is embedded in every day life, yet you insist on ignoring it.

Whateverman, I don't mean to be rude, but are you really thick?

Please stop making wild and absurd statesments.

"Evolutionism is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless."
-Professor Louis Bounoure, past president of the Biological Society of Strassbourg, Director of the Strassbourg Zoological Museum, Director of Research at the French National Center of Scientific Research. (Quoted in The Advocate, March 8, 1984.)

Whateverman: "That's a lie. The direct context (as...

2008-08-26T00:39:00.000+01:00
Whateverman: "That's a lie. The direct context (as included in your clip) is in regard to not seeing Napoleon. It has nothing to do with Mckay or God."

Puritan: Whateverman, now you're getting really desperate, why not just admit you made a mistake, and that my quote is in context. To claim the quote has nothing to do with what Mackay said, when it's obvious to anyone with a reasonable mind, that Dawkins is commenting on what Mackay said.

You're being intentionally ignorant, Puritan. This discussion is about context. The only context available in the clip you provided shows Dawkins making the statement, and then going on to talk about the silliness of not believing in Napolean.

It does not show, in any way, that Dawkins was responding to McKay.

You provided the clip. It obvious that you also pieced it together, rather than simply letting it run without editing.

If there was context other than the one you showed, that simply PROVES that you took the clip out of context.

Puritan: "No, if you listen Mackay says Dawkins 1859, and we've still not seen any evidence for the fairy tale of evolution."

Keep ignoring the development of antibiotic resisyance in microorganisms. Really, it helps your case immensely.

... though it also reveals you to be a liar.

"Actually evolution is not repeatable testable sci...

2008-08-26T00:31:00.000+01:00
"Actually evolution is not repeatable testable science"

Evolution is based upon repeatedly tested and falsified science.

Without this being true, the polio vaccine would not exist today. Evidence of the validity of evolutionary theory is embedded in every day life, yet you insist on ignoring it.

You would do yourself (and your God-given brain) some justice by looking up "Evolution" on Wiki and reading the information. It would provide some minimal education that you either lack currently or insist on ignoring.

Whateverman, you wrote, "which sounds more like...

2008-08-26T00:17:00.000+01:00
Whateverman, you wrote, "which sounds more like a fairy tail? A book where snakes talk and the whole universe was created in 6 days, or a theory that is continually studied and experimented with? I'll take the proven theory any day."

Actually evolution is not repeatable testable science, like for instance medical science. Origins "science" is really a religious phillosophy.

Face it. We are both religious. The only difference is that you have much more faith than me, as I don't have enough faith to believe evolution.

"That's a lie. The direct context (as included ...

2008-08-25T23:33:00.000+01:00
"That's a lie. The direct context (as included in your clip) is in regard to not seeing Napoleon. It has nothing to do with Mckay or God."

Whateverman, now you're getting really desperate, why not just admit you made a mistake, and that my quote is in context. To claim the quote has nothing to do with what Mackay said, when it's obvious to anyone with a reasonable mind, that Dawkins is commenting on what Mackay said.

"McKay refuses to believe in evolution because he doesn't see it personally in one lifetime.

No, if you listen Mackay says Dawkins 1859, and we've still not seen any evidence for the fairy tale of evolution.

Notice also Dawkins didn't argue with Mackay there and point any evidence out, because he knows Mackay is not as foolish as Dawkins fans who will accept anything he says without question.

"Without scientific evidence, the theory of evolution would not exist."
Evolution is a classic case of the emperors new clothes. You all shout loudly what nice new clothes he's wearing when even a child can see the emperor is naked.

"which sounds more like a fairy tail? A book where...

2008-08-25T23:25:00.000+01:00
"which sounds more like a fairy tail? A book where snakes talk and the whole universe was created in 6 days, or a theory that is continually studied and experimented with? I'll take the proven theory any day."

Even better than "proven", Adam, is a theory which is perfectly willing to declare itself Wrong if evidence suggests it.

Religion? Not so much...

"Whateverman, it seems you refuse to acknowledge w...

2008-08-25T21:23:00.000+01:00
"Whateverman, it seems you refuse to acknowledge what Dawkins was talking about. His comment was a reference to John MacKay saying we have never seen evolution happen and we should see it happen."

That's a lie. The direct context (as included in your clip) is in regard to not seeing Napolean. It has nothing to do with Mckay or God.

McKay refuses to believe in evolution because he doesn't see it personally in one lifetime.

Without scientific evidence, the theory of evolution would not exist. You're intentionally misrepresenting the context of this quote to justify your anti-atheist paradigm.

---

And no, you were never in my shoes. And that is simply because I have never been an atheist.

Use your God-given brain. Intentionally not doing so betrays your lack of faith in God's design.

Whateverman, it seems you refuse to acknowledge wh...

2008-08-25T21:11:00.000+01:00
Whateverman, it seems you refuse to acknowledge what Dawkins was talking about. His comment was a reference to John MacKay saying we have never seen evolution happen and we should see it happen.

I'm not sure how you think Dawkins going on to use examples of cells and from weather negates the fact the that Dawkins refusal to believe in a God He hasn't seen comes under the same criteria.

Sorry mate but you can’t explain it away.

Like most atheist-evolutionists it appears you are not in anyway shape or form interested in truth, and you will accept any argument, no matter how ridiculous, so long as it doesn't involve believing the God of the Bible.

Please try reading the link, at the bottom of the post. I used to be in your shoes.

For you to change your "opinion" about Jesus, i...

2008-08-25T21:03:00.000+01:00
For you to change your "opinion" about Jesus, it takes a supernatural work of God. Where God changes your heart and desire from a wicked hater of God, to a lover of righteousness.

Then you have no need to criticize atheism, do you. If atheists don't have the ability to change their own minds, of what use is it to preach to them?

Or, perhaps, do you feel you're doing God's Work when trying to convert people? If so, you're guilty of the sin of pride; God's work is not yours.

"Dawkins quote is directly after he interviews Joh...

2008-08-25T21:00:00.000+01:00
"Dawkins quote is directly after he interviews John MacKay. (You know the bit on the video where MacKay logically proves evolution is blind faith.) So you get the context."

Yup. And the context regards things like molecules and weather systems. Not God.

You're accused of taking the quote out of context because you ignore what Dawkins was talking about, and try to spin a single sentence into an anti-atheism jab. Clever, but wholly without substance.

If you refuse to see this, and truly believe that Dawkins discredited atheism, then you have to admit your refusal to believe in evolution is absurd.

You have no intellectual credibility.

I guess that either I mis-wrote what I was trying ...

2008-08-25T20:27:00.000+01:00
I guess that either I mis-wrote what I was trying to say or you misunderstood. As an atheist, I don't just "change your opinion at any point, so long as it doesn't involve believing in the God of the Bible." I change my opinion based on scientific study and reason. Something most Christians or other religious folk can't do.

If a scientific theory states that the sky is purple, but through testing, research and sound reason, the theory changes and we realize the sky is blue, then that is called reason. Proving and disproving hypothesis based on reason and analytical thinking.

Religions are based upon texts written millennia ago. Written at a time when certain natural events couldn't be explained. So of course, needing the supernatural to explain these things was needed...not so anymore. This is what science and reason have given us...because while some people hid in buildings praying to invisible people, real people were making discoveries to help understand the world around us.

If nothing else, progress itself proves that the scientific method works. If it didn't we'd still be living in the stone ages. Just because we haven't answered every question yet, doesn't mean that some god created everything.

Honestly, which sounds more like a fairy tail? A book where snakes talk and the whole universe was created in 6 days, or a theory that is continually studied and experimented with? I'll take the proven theory any day.

Adam, whilst to an extent it is true you can chang...

2008-08-25T17:36:00.000+01:00
Adam, whilst to an extent it is true you can change your opinion at any point, so long as it doesn't involve believing in the God of the Bible.

-In fact that is my experience of debating with athesits, that they are prepared to believe anything, no matter how absurd (like the fairy-tale of evolution), so longer as they don't have to submit to their creator.-

But it is not true that you can change your mind about God at anytime. Jesus said in John 6:44 "No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him. And I will raise him up on the last day."

To "come to" Jesus, is a Hebrew way of saying to believe and be saved and get to Heaven. But He says "no one can unless" Can is a word of ability.

In other words you don't have the ability to change your opinion and believe Jesus, unless,

And "unless" there is if He draws you.

The Bible teaches you won't come to your Creator Jesus, not because there is no evidence for Him, quite the opposite" but that: "people loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil." and so "For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed."

For you to change your "opinion" about Jesus, it takes a supernatural work of God. Where God changes your heart and desire from a wicked hater of God, to a lover of righteousness.

I don't use anyone's drawings or anything else...I...

2008-08-25T17:19:00.000+01:00
I don't use anyone's drawings or anything else...I guess that would be the difference. I take what is shown, ie experiments, data, etc. and I take what someone tells me with no proof and I make a decision.

The difference between you and I is that I can change my opinion because of new evidence/theories/proof. You and most other religious people have your faith and nothing that anyone shows you will change that. I guess having conviction is a good thing, but not when it blinds you to what you're shown.

This is why I try to avoid this kinds of discussions. I'm willing to have an open mind...when you can show proof. Religious people I know can't have an open mind. It's not even possible due to the fact that their "faith" says it's so and so it's true...no matter what else you see.

Adam,

Dawkins quote is directly after he in...

2008-08-25T15:41:00.000+01:00
Adam,

Dawkins quote is directly after he interviews John MacKay. (You know the bit on the video where MacKay logically proves evolution is blind faith.) So you get the context.

And for an added bonus, I play Dawkins using Ernst Haeckel's Embryo drawings, which have been known to be fraudulent for well over 100 years, as proof for the fairy tale of evolution. Funny how you atheists always seem to claim you don't use Haeckel as proof.

Wow...this is just retarded...

I guess some...

2008-08-25T15:34:00.000+01:00
Wow...this is just retarded...

I guess someone figured out how to use Audacity to cut the parts they wanted to cut. Congratulations. You know how to edit sound files.

Comments on Puritan Fellowship: Dawkins Admits Atheism Is Absurd-Audio Clip

Equitable,

I did not take Dawkin's quote ou...

I do not have an atheist agenda in writing this co...

Hi Shh,

As Dawkins admitted in the program ...

"the refusal to believe in anything you can't see ...

John MacKay will be speaking at a church hear in M...

To all the atheist-evolutionist,
Whateve...

Whateverman,

“That context is not appare...

Whateverman wrote: "It does not show, in any way, ...

Whateverman wrote: "It does not show, in any wa...

"Without this being true, the polio vaccine wou...

Whateverman: "That's a lie. The direct context (as...

"Actually evolution is not repeatable testable sci...

Whateverman, you wrote, "which sounds more like...

"That's a lie. The direct context (as included ...

"which sounds more like a fairy tail? A book where...

"Whateverman, it seems you refuse to acknowledge w...

Whateverman, it seems you refuse to acknowledge wh...

For you to change your "opinion" about Jesus, i...

"Dawkins quote is directly after he interviews Joh...

I guess that either I mis-wrote what I was trying ...

Adam, whilst to an extent it is true you can chang...

I don't use anyone's drawings or anything else...I...

Adam,

Dawkins quote is directly after he in...

Wow...this is just retarded...

I guess some...

Comments on Puritan Fellowship: Dawkins Admits Atheism Is Absurd-Audio Clip

Equitable,I did not take Dawkin's quote ou...

I do not have an atheist agenda in writing this co...

Hi Shh,As Dawkins admitted in the program ...

"the refusal to believe in anything you can't see ...

John MacKay will be speaking at a church hear in M...

To all the atheist-evolutionist,Whateve...

Whateverman,“That context is not appare...

Whateverman wrote: "It does not show, in any way, ...

Whateverman wrote: "It does not show, in any wa...

"Without this being true, the polio vaccine wou...

Whateverman: "That's a lie. The direct context (as...

"Actually evolution is not repeatable testable sci...

Whateverman, you wrote, "which sounds more like...

"That's a lie. The direct context (as included ...

"which sounds more like a fairy tail? A book where...

"Whateverman, it seems you refuse to acknowledge w...

Whateverman, it seems you refuse to acknowledge wh...

For you to change your "opinion" about Jesus, i...

"Dawkins quote is directly after he interviews Joh...

I guess that either I mis-wrote what I was trying ...

Adam, whilst to an extent it is true you can chang...

I don't use anyone's drawings or anything else...I...

Adam,Dawkins quote is directly after he in...

Wow...this is just retarded...I guess some...

Equitable,

I did not take Dawkin's quote ou...

Hi Shh,

As Dawkins admitted in the program ...

To all the atheist-evolutionist,
Whateve...

Whateverman,

“That context is not appare...

Adam,

Dawkins quote is directly after he in...

Wow...this is just retarded...

I guess some...